Re: parsing URI (references) according to RFC 3986

On 2011-06-19 15:49, Adam Barth wrote:
> Regardless of whether you consider it a bug, browsers need to parse
> different schemes differently.  If your proposal doesn't do that, then
> it's not going to work.  (It's not just a matter of post-processing
> goofy characters.)
> ...

Adam, please read what I wrote. I *did* say that it might be necessary 
to do scheme-specific post-processing.

Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 14:00:25 UTC