public-iri@w3.org from February 2011 by subject

[apps-discuss] URI registry

• Graham Klyne (Thursday, 10 February)
• Tony Hansen (Thursday, 10 February)
• Alexey Melnikov (Thursday, 10 February)

[iri] 4395bis #54 (new): Give more details about what 'provisional' status means

• Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Thursday, 10 February)
• Martin J. Dürst (Thursday, 10 February)
• Tony Hansen (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Wednesday, 9 February)
• iri issue tracker (Wednesday, 9 February)

[iri] 4395bis #55 (new): Decide on the status of 'afs' URI scheme

• iri issue tracker (Wednesday, 9 February)

[iri] 4395bis #56 (new): References in 4395bis

• iri issue tracker (Wednesday, 9 February)

[iri] 4395bis #57 (new): Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4

• Peter Saint-Andre (Friday, 18 February)
• Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Wednesday, 16 February)
• iri issue tracker (Wednesday, 16 February)
• iri issue tracker (Friday, 11 February)

Fwd: IRI - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 80

• Marc Blanchet (Friday, 25 February)

FWD: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme

• Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Wednesday, 9 February)

URI registry (was: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme)

• Martin J. Dürst (Thursday, 10 February)

URI registrywas: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme

• Mykyta Yevstifeyev (Thursday, 10 February)
• t.petch (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Martin J. Dürst (Wednesday, 9 February)

Last message date: Friday, 25 February 2011 00:47:41 UTC