Re: [iri] 4395bis #57 (new): Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4

2011/2/16, iri issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>:
> #57: Add some language similar to RFC 3864, section 4.4
>
>
> Comment(by duerst@…):
>
>  Additional information from Graham Klyne:
>
>  I wouldn't necessarily hold up the text from RFC3864 as a shining example
>  of what might be said, as on re-reading that the intent isn't crystal
>  clear in light of subsequent discussions.  But I appreciate that you have
>  picked up the notion in the spirit intended.
>
>  My further thoughts are:
>
>  1. that any text should be framed in terms of negotiation and consensus
>  forming rather than objections to registration
>
>  2. that any text should emphasize that the majority of non-contentious
>  registrations should incur very little administrative overhead on part of
>  IANA or IESG
>
>  3. that the role of IESG as final arbiter is a role that should be invoked
>  exceptionally rather than routinely.
>
>  Thus, maybe something like this:
>  [[
>  The registration procedure for URI schemes is intended to be very
>  lightweight for non-contentious registrations.  For the most part, we
>  expect the good sense of submitters and reviewers, guided by these
>  procedures, to achieve an acceptable and useful consensus for the
>  community.
>
>  In exceptional cases, where the negotiating parties cannot form a
>  consensus, the final arbiter of any contested registration shall be the
>  IESG.
>
>  If parties achieve consensus on a registration proposal that does not
>  fully conform to the strict wording of this procedure, this should be
>  drawn to the attention of a relevant member of the IESG.

Who is the *relevant* member of IESG?  And what is if it is a
provisional regsitration
in not-IETF RFC, eg Independent Submission?  Who will be the relevant
IESG member then?

I propose to leave the IESG without the words 'relevant member of' in
this proposal.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

>  ]]
>  I think this pretty much covers what happens at the moment.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  duerst@…                |       Owner:
>      Type:  defect                  |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  major                   |   Milestone:
> Component:  4395bis                 |     Version:
>  Severity:  -                       |    Keywords:
> ------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
>
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/57#comment:1>
> iri <http://tools.ietf.org/bof/iri/>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 09:26:42 UTC