Re: [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations

#107: Clarify requirement for security considerations

Changes (by masinter@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 Text changed:

             The scheme definition SHOULD include a clear Security
 Considerations
             section (as with permanent scheme registrations<xref
 target='secguide'/>)
             or explain why a full security analysis is not available
 (e.g., with
             a third-party scheme registration).

-- 
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  dthaler@…       |       Owner:  draft-ietf-iri-4395bis-irireg@…
     Type:  defect          |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major           |   Milestone:
Component:  4395bis-irireg  |     Version:
 Severity:  Active WG       |  Resolution:  fixed
  Document                  |
 Keywords:                  |
----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/107#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>