Re: [iri] #70: RFC 2119 language in Section 3.1 of 4395bis

#70: RFC 2119 language in Section 3.1 of 4395bis

Changes (by masinter@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 Based on the discussion at IETF82, the following changes


 <         is costly; some parts of URI/IRI processing may be scheme-
 dependent,
 ---
 >         may be costly; some parts of URI/IRI processing may be scheme-
 dependent,


 207,209c207,211
 <         New URI/IRI schemes SHOULD have clear utility to the broad
 <           Internet community, beyond that available with already
 registered URI/IRI
 <           schemes.
 ---
 >
 >         New schemes should have utility to the
 >           Internet community beyond that available with already
 registered
 >           schemes. The registration document SHOULD discuss the utility
 >           of the scheme being registered.

-- 
-------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  evnikita2@…  |       Owner:
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:
Component:  4395bis      |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+---------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/70#comment:4>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 00:36:17 UTC