- From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:56:37 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: public-iri@w3.org
I'm sorry. That should have read:
All of the above items are in response to the errata found at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395 and the issues in the Trac issue tracker found at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1
I hope that helps.
Tony Hansen
On 9/30/2010 5:34 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Tony Hansen wrote:
>
>> A draft for 4395bis was just posted, with the intent that this become
>> draft-ietf-iri-4395bis to fulfill that WG work item.
>>
>> Appendix A. Changes Since RFC 4395
>>
>> 1. Significant edits to be clear that a "URI scheme" and an "IRI
>> scheme" are the same thing.
>> 2. Added the "example:" URL Scheme.
>> 3. Allow for IRI-specific scheme registration.
>> 4. Clarify that the URI scheme registry is also the IRI scheme
>> registry.
>>
>> All of the above items are in response to the errata found at
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395
>>
> That just notes the incorrect BCP number?
>
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 23:57:16 UTC