W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > October 2010

Re: [Uri-review] Updated 'javascript' scheme draft

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:25:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4CA9E3D7.3020206@gmx.de>
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, IRI WG mailing list <public-iri@w3.org>
On 01.10.2010 08:43, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> ...
> However, especially in respect to the question of whether to define an
> IRI scheme or an URI scheme, I think it would be much more productive to
> try and see whether this scheme proposal fits
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hansen-iri-4395bis-irireg-00.txt
> (which allows registration of new schemes both as URIs and as IRIs and
> makes clear that there is only one registry), and on the other hand
> check whether draft-hansen-iri-4395bis-irireg is written so that it
> allows to do what works best in the case of the 'javascript:' scheme.
> ...

Hi Martin,

I'm not sure what Björn's plans with respect to timing are. But if he's 
willing to add a dependency on the new registration procedure than his 
spec is certainly a good test case for it.

...so I'd say it's up to Björn...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 14:26:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:59 GMT