W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > October 2010

FW: I-D Action:draft-hansen-iri-4395bis-irireg-00.txt

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:25:44 -0400
To: "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C7A5719F1E562149BA9171F58BEE2CA412A13D42B6@EX-IAD6-B.ant.amazon.com>
(co-chair hat ON)

Dear working group,

Tony Hansen (et al) has kindly submitted this draft as an individual submission:


This document is one that this working group is chartered [1] to produce. This note serves as an official "call for consensus" to adopt this document as an official Working Group draft. Please indicate on this list whether you support or have objections to making it official. This does not mean that the draft is intended as final;  comments are welcome on this document (please send them separately).

Addison (for the chairs)

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/charters

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-iri-request@w3.org [mailto:public-iri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of "Martin J. Dürst"
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:32 PM
To: Tony Hansen
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann; public-iri@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-hansen-iri-4395bis-irireg-00.txt

And for everybody's reference, a diff is here:

I personally hope that this document will be a WG draft soon.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2010/10/01 8:56, Tony Hansen wrote:
> I'm sorry. That should have read:
> All of the above items are in response to the errata found at
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395 and the issues in
> the Trac issue tracker found at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1
> I hope that helps.
> Tony Hansen
> On 9/30/2010 5:34 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> * Tony Hansen wrote:
>>> A draft for 4395bis was just posted, with the intent that this become
>>> draft-ietf-iri-4395bis to fulfill that WG work item.
>>> Appendix A. Changes Since RFC 4395
>>> 1. Significant edits to be clear that a "URI scheme" and an "IRI
>>> scheme" are the same thing.
>>> 2. Added the "example:" URL Scheme.
>>> 3. Allow for IRI-specific scheme registration.
>>> 4. Clarify that the URI scheme registry is also the IRI scheme
>>> registry.
>>> All of the above items are in response to the errata found at
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395
>> That just notes the incorrect BCP number?

#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 16:23:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:41 UTC