- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:31:40 +0900
- To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-iri@w3.org
And for everybody's reference, a diff is here: http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4395.txt&url2=http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hansen-iri-4395bis-irireg-00.txt I personally hope that this document will be a WG draft soon. Regards, Martin. On 2010/10/01 8:56, Tony Hansen wrote: > I'm sorry. That should have read: > > All of the above items are in response to the errata found at > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395 and the issues in > the Trac issue tracker found at > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1 > > I hope that helps. > > > Tony Hansen > > On 9/30/2010 5:34 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> * Tony Hansen wrote: >>> A draft for 4395bis was just posted, with the intent that this become >>> draft-ietf-iri-4395bis to fulfill that WG work item. >>> >>> Appendix A. Changes Since RFC 4395 >>> >>> 1. Significant edits to be clear that a "URI scheme" and an "IRI >>> scheme" are the same thing. >>> 2. Added the "example:" URL Scheme. >>> 3. Allow for IRI-specific scheme registration. >>> 4. Clarify that the URI scheme registry is also the IRI scheme >>> registry. >>> >>> All of the above items are in response to the errata found at >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395 >> That just notes the incorrect BCP number? > > -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 06:32:57 UTC