W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2010

RE: Requirement for internal direction changes (was Re: [bidi] Re: Special ordering for BIDI URLs)

From: Abdulrahman I. ALGhadir <aghadir@citc.gov.sa>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:42:33 +0300
Message-ID: <0F9C0B65969D644EA7B34DF381465F660153A4B5@RY02MAIL.citc.gov.sa>
To: "Slim Amamou" <slim@alixsys.com>, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-iri@w3.org>
Well numbers (arabic/english) have same common things and mostly direction but IRI adapted English as it base with this isn’t “universal”

 

 

From: public-iri-request@w3.org [mailto:public-iri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Slim Amamou
Sent: 26/May/2010 10:38 AM
To: Ted Hardie
Cc: public-iri@w3.org
Subject: Re: Requirement for internal direction changes (was Re: [bidi] Re: Special ordering for BIDI URLs)

 

 

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

(...) One discussion point that I seem to recall touched on a context in which the
local language was right-to-left but numbers appearing within the text
using Hindu-Arabic numerals (0-9) were left-to-right.


This is always the case in all RTL languages, digits order in numbers notation is universally LTR (leftmost digit yields the biggest power of ten)

IRIs should be as universal as numbers.



-- 
Slim Amamou | سليم عمامو
http://alixsys.com



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This message and its attachment, if any, are confidential and may contain legally
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender immediately and delete this message and its attachment, if any, from your
system. You should not copy this message or disclose its contents to any other
person or use it for any purpose. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail
are those of the sender, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Communications
and Information Technology Commission (CITC). CITC accepts no liability for damage
caused by this email.
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 07:44:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:57 GMT