W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Scope question

From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 11:37:34 -0700
Message-ID: <y2x5c4444771005051137ha3e82c16w8809f5446b12976c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Marc Blanchet
<marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> Le 10-05-05 14:11, Adam Barth a écrit :
>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Phillips, Addison<addison@lab126.com>
>>  wrote:
>> As I read the charter, we're not supposed to address issues in RFC
>> 3986, which might place this document out of scope depending on the
>> division of responsibilities between RFC 3986 and RFC 3987.
>
> while the charter may say one thing, there is nothing that prevent you to do
> useful work to the community that might be used later to do the right thing.
> Educating people on how implementations work is very valuable. For example,
> you could write an individual draft that would be valuable to this
> community. That draft might be then used, adopted, integrated, ... to some
> wg documents.
>
> So I encourage you to write a draft showing what you found in different
> implementations. Drafts are free!

Ok.  Thanks for the feedback.  I'll try not to step on any toes and
hopefully the work will be useful to the community.

Thanks,
Adam
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:38:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:57 GMT