Re: Scope question

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Marc Blanchet
<marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> Le 10-05-05 14:11, Adam Barth a écrit :
>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Phillips, Addison<addison@lab126.com>
>>  wrote:
>> As I read the charter, we're not supposed to address issues in RFC
>> 3986, which might place this document out of scope depending on the
>> division of responsibilities between RFC 3986 and RFC 3987.
>
> while the charter may say one thing, there is nothing that prevent you to do
> useful work to the community that might be used later to do the right thing.
> Educating people on how implementations work is very valuable. For example,
> you could write an individual draft that would be valuable to this
> community. That draft might be then used, adopted, integrated, ... to some
> wg documents.
>
> So I encourage you to write a draft showing what you found in different
> implementations. Drafts are free!

Ok.  Thanks for the feedback.  I'll try not to step on any toes and
hopefully the work will be useful to the community.

Thanks,
Adam