W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Scope question

From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 11:37:34 -0700
Message-ID: <y2x5c4444771005051137ha3e82c16w8809f5446b12976c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Marc Blanchet
<marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> Le 10-05-05 14:11, Adam Barth a écrit :
>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Phillips, Addison<addison@lab126.com>
>>  wrote:
>> As I read the charter, we're not supposed to address issues in RFC
>> 3986, which might place this document out of scope depending on the
>> division of responsibilities between RFC 3986 and RFC 3987.
> while the charter may say one thing, there is nothing that prevent you to do
> useful work to the community that might be used later to do the right thing.
> Educating people on how implementations work is very valuable. For example,
> you could write an individual draft that would be valuable to this
> community. That draft might be then used, adopted, integrated, ... to some
> wg documents.
> So I encourage you to write a draft showing what you found in different
> implementations. Drafts are free!

Ok.  Thanks for the feedback.  I'll try not to step on any toes and
hopefully the work will be useful to the community.

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:38:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:41 UTC