W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Scope question

From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:27:42 -0400
Message-ID: <4BE1B89E.1050803@viagenie.ca>
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
Le 10-05-05 14:11, Adam Barth a écrit :
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Phillips, Addison<addison@lab126.com>  wrote:
> As I read the charter, we're not supposed to address issues in RFC
> 3986, which might place this document out of scope depending on the
> division of responsibilities between RFC 3986 and RFC 3987.
>

while the charter may say one thing, there is nothing that prevent you 
to do useful work to the community that might be used later to do the 
right thing. Educating people on how implementations work is very 
valuable. For example, you could write an individual draft that would be 
valuable to this community. That draft might be then used, adopted, 
integrated, ... to some wg documents.

So I encourage you to write a draft showing what you found in different 
implementations. Drafts are free!

Regards, Marc.

> Adam


-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN news service: http://reeves.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:28:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:57 GMT