(unknown charset) Re: A new RFC for Web Addresses/Hypertext References: Background wrt LEIRIs ( ISSUE-27 )

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> Once it became apparent, however, that the progress of [IRI-BIS] to
> Draft Standard status was likely to be considerably delayed for
> reasons outside its editors' control

Two questions have arisen wrt this:

 1) Why "Draft Standard"?

    My mistake -- I misunderstood the IETF nomenclature -- all we need
    is for [IRI-BIS] to be published as an RFC with an RFC number.

 2) What "reasons outside its editors' control"?

    I don't trust my memory of the relevant rumours sufficiently to
    commit it to print: Martin, would you care to hazard a guess as to
    when [IRI-BIS] might be published as an RFC, and/or tell us what
    the hold-up was or is?

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ/x05kjnJixAXWBoRAqONAJ9ZgBE+0gekeIITtx4HFgeLz4QdcACbBci8
C4ky5KpXgSTsQVgzVNhPwJ4=
=lQAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 17:47:06 UTC