W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Generic URI syntax incompatible with IPv6 addresses in SIP URIs

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:05:42 +0200
Message-ID: <49D285A6.6060104@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Baker <mark@coactus.com>, public-iri@w3.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> Well, I'm confused.  "Moving" was a loose term, but I did think I
> heard that we should join "public-?ri" (didn't hear very clearly at
> the bar bof) and "public-iri" was the match I found.  Since I'm a
> newcomer to either list (URI work has been pretty slow while I've been
> AD), just let me know which list we should use to discuss updating the
> IETF URI RFCs.

Well, we've got both

   <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/>

and

   <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/>

As far as I can tell, the discussion is about:

- a potential issue with the IRI spec (normalization)

and

- a potential addition already drafted in RFC3987bis (LEIRIs)

In particular, I haven't seen any bugs reported against RFC3986 in this 
context (except the lack of error handling requirements, which clearly 
is controversial).

Thus, it seems that we are really talking about RFC3987bis, and thus the 
IRI mailing list would be the right place.

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 21:06:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:54 GMT