- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:34:51 +0900
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, public-iri@w3.org
At one point, it definitely was. Many people on the uri list were not interested in IRI issues, and some i18n experts on the IRI list weren't interested in URI issues. Of course, times may have changed, and in case we'd decide to stuff all the HTML5 bugwards-compatibility stuff for URIs into the IRI spec because the URI spec is already at Full Standard, things might change. Regards, Martin. On 2009/03/31 20:10, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Just thinking out loud -- is it *really* a good idea to have separate > URI and IRI lists? > > Cheers,
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 07:35:55 UTC