Re: Path Normalization Causing Issues(B

Hello Bjoern, Geoffrey,

Bjoern is correct. Also, this part of the IRI spec is exactly
the same as in the URI spec, so if it were a problem, it would
be a problem there, too.

Regards,    Martin.

At 02:40 08/12/03, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
>* Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
>>As ".." is an IRI, it can be normalized, which results in "". This is  
>>obviously problematic. Should path segment normalization only be done  
>>when there is a scheme and/or authority?
>
>If you look at section 2.2 of RFC 3987 you find that '..' is not an IRI.
>-- 
>Bj$B‹S(Bn H$B‹I(Brmann $B%-(B mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de $B%-(B http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>Am Badedeich 7 $B%-(B Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 $B%-(B http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>25899 Dageb$B—M(Bl $B%-(B PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 $B%-(B http://www.websitedev.de/ 


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp