Re: Fwd: Re: ZWNJ and ZWJ being ignorable

The IRI spec doesn't say anything about ZWJ/ZWNJ, and so
it can be said to be "at least not wrong". IRIs, except
for transcoding issues from legacy encodings and those
parts that are case-insensitive, are always compared
codepoint by codepoint. I guess Unicode should fix their
text about ZWJ/ZWNJ, but there is nothing in the IRI
spec (as far as I see) that needs fixing for this issue.

Regards,    Martin.

At 17:32 05/08/16, Felix Sasaki wrote:
 >Hi,
 >
 >This came up at the unicode list. I'm not sure if is an issue for IRI /
 >the future development of the IRI spec, but I'm bringing it to the
 >attention of www-international and public-iri. Any comments? 

Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 10:29:11 UTC