- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:02:54 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org
At 18:05 12/05/04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote: >Hello Graham, > >I have marked this as issue 5.2resolve-32. > >At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: > >>Section 5.2: >> >>The MUST in the second paragraph seems to be straying inappropriately >>into application design territory. > >Sorry, but I don't think so. If different applications resolve >in different ways, that would be a very bad idea. I agree that would not be good. I think the "MUST" in the first paragraph addresses this. I was referring to the "MUST" in the second paragraph: [[ For comparison, such conversions MUST only be done on the fly, while retaining the original IRI. ]] #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 09:25:59 UTC