- From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:57:00 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, group-invited-experts@w3.org
- Cc: public-invited-experts@w3.org
Dear all, > On 10 Jan 2019, at 15:47 , fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > Hi Coralie! > > In general, I am supportive of this effort. However wrt ... > >> 2) A public mailing list so you can interact among yourselves. >> cf. <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-invited-experts/> > > I think a Member-only list instead or in addition would maybe be more > useful here. Technical discussions belong in the public technical fora, > but if we are coordinating personal logistics--which I imagine to be > the main benefit of such a list--it's helpful if that discussion doesn't > have to be public? The public mailing list has now been replaced by group-invited-experts@w3.org cf.https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Group/group-invited-experts/ This list is set up for subscribers the same way the public list was. The archive is available to Members of the invited expert group and the W3C Team. I have updated the verbiage in <https://www.w3.org/participate/invited-experts/#identity>. Unless there are objections, we will replace public-invited-experts with an autoresponder directing people to the new list. The reply-to of this mail is set to the new list. With kind regards, Coralie > > E.g. the CSSWG often uses the internal list to coordinate housing, dinner, > cell phone number swaps, etc... not really info that should be public. > (The rest of the list scope is general administrivia, to keep it off of > the public list. That could be public but isn't particularly interesting > to the public so didn't deserve its own public ML.) > > ~fantasai > -- Coralie Mercier - W3C Marketing & Communications - https://www.w3.org mailto:coralie@w3.org +337 810 795 22 https://www.w3.org/People/Coralie/
Received on Friday, 18 January 2019 10:57:05 UTC