Propose a Group -> https://www.w3.org/community/ On 19 April 2017 at 20:46, Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com> wrote: > Michiel, that's a great idea, but I'm not sure the "smart contract" > protocol is ready for it. > > Would it be possible to form a group focusing on contract structure, as > others have suggested? > > I'm not sure how to do that. > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Thanks for raising the question of making for-profit ledgers (like, one >> day, your Promise app?) ILP compatible. >> >> On Apr 18, 2017 8:45 PM, "Andrew Bransford Brown" <andrewbb@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Good job on the ILP call. >> >> >> There is nothing precluding each member of this group from profiting or >> creating for-profit entities based on these protocols. >> >> >> Correct! Your Promise app could also be ILP-based for the payment part of >> contract execution. Even if you don't publish its source code, you can make >> it compatible with other people's apps. >> >> That means, you use your Promise app, other members use their own >> software on their own server, yet payments succeed end-to-end. That's the >> Interledger vision. >> >> There is a public network of ILP-enabled servers, see >> https://connector.land. >> >> Would you be interested in joining the public Interledger network with >> your Promise app? >> >> >> The purpose is to convene upon open standards. Through a standard >> language, all can benefit. >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 22:51:24 UTC