Re: IRC and Gitter

Thanks for the reminder.
Lucas
-- 

Am 29. August 2016 21:30:10 MESZ, schrieb Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>:
>RE: "Etherpad can also integrated into odoo notes module."
>
>Good to know.
>
>BTW -- I think you replied only to me and not to the list.
>
>
>Joseph Potvin
>Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations
>The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman
>jpotvin@opman.ca
>Mobile: 819-593-5983
>LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joseph-potvin/2/148/423>
>
>On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Lucas Huber <lh@codoo.io> wrote:
>
>> If the opposite, a full featured solution is what we are looking for,
>I
>> recommend to have a look at Odoo. A very versatile modular foss
>business
>> suite. It comes with slack like messaging including mobile apps, but
>also
>> usable by mail. Etherpad can also integrated into odoo notes module.
>>
>> Lucas
>> --
>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
>> gesendet.
>>
>> Am 29. August 2016 20:17:13 MESZ, schrieb Joseph Potvin
><jpotvin@opman.ca
>> >:
>>>
>>> For a low-feature, stupid-simple (+ some clever features),
>>> free/libre/open option via brower or mobile, there's the
>co-authoring+chat
>>> environment http://etherpad.org/
>>>
>>> It's ready-hosted at many locations (e.g.
>https://etherpad.wikimedia.org
>>> )  ...or run one as https://etherpad.interledger.org
>>>
>>> It provides both the chat and co-authored minutes in one view.
>>>
>>> Not for the terminal interface participants.
>>>
>>> Joseph Potvin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Paul Frazee <pfrazee@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Possibly Matrix.org
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Rafael Pereira
><rafael@rippex.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Someone must develop SMTP for IMs :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Obrigado,
>>>>> Rafael
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Rippex - O Gateway Ripple do Brasil]
>>>>>
>>>>> *Rafael Olaio - CEO *
>>>>> tel +55 11 2337.2225
>>>>> cel +55 11 99522.7572
>>>>> rippex.net
>>>>> Esta mensagem pode conter informação confidencial e/ou
>privilegiada. Se
>>>>> você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta
>mensagem,
>>>>> não poderá usar, copiar ou divulgar as informações nela contidas
>ou tomar
>>>>> qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Se você recebeu esta
>mensagem por
>>>>> engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, respondendo o
>e-mail e
>>>>> em seguida apague-o.This message may contain confidential and/or
>>>>> privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized
>to
>>>>> receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose
>or take
>>>>> any action based on this message or any information here in. If
>you have
>>>>> received this message in error, please advise the sender
>immediately by
>>>>> reply e-mail and delete this message.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-08-29 14:33 GMT-03:00 Adrian Hope-Bailie
><adrian@hopebailie.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I polled the group about using Slack a while back and the general
>>>>>> consensus was that they didn't want to use it and would prefer
>open tech
>>>>>> like IRC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you log into Gitter you'll be able to link it to a Slack
>channel if
>>>>>> that's what you'd like to do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 29 August 2016 at 18:27, M AV <av_m@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any reason not considering Slack?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Adrian Hope-Bailie [mailto:adrian@hopebailie.com]
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 5:57 AM
>>>>>>> *To:* Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> *Cc:* Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: IRC and Gitter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Update: Since the W3C IRC has no NickServ we can't use
>sameroom.io
>>>>>>> which requires this :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 29 August 2016 at 11:46, Adrian Hope-Bailie
><adrian@hopebailie.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> re: 'possibly host' : We can host it ourselves (I will see if
>Ripple
>>>>>>> can sponsor this) or we can use a hosted service like
>sameroom.io.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> re cost:
>>>>>>> - Sameroom.io = $49/month (5 channels),
>>>>>>> - hosted = is cost of hosting and people to manage/setup
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26 August 2016 at 16:22, Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For option 2, what is the cost of managing another service? And
>why
>>>>>>> is it 'possibly host?'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 2016 10:04 AM, "Adrian Hope-Bailie"
><adrian@hopebailie.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have done some investigating and have two options for us with
>>>>>>> regard to using Gitter but still offering IRC for those that
>prefer that
>>>>>>> channel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Option 1: Switch to Gitter hosted IRC server*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you visit http://irc.gitter.im you'll see instructions for
>>>>>>> connecting to a secure IRC server using a unique, per-user
>server key.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once you connect you'll be logged into an IRC channel for each
>Gitter
>>>>>>> room and use the same Nick as your github username.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anything posted in either system is mirrored in the other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pros:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Secure IRC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Tight integration with Gitter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cons:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Need to switch to a new IRC server
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Lose the W3C IRC bots
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Option 2: Setup a bridge between Gitter and W3C IRC*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are bots that can monitor both systems and mirror messages
>>>>>>> between them. We can use https://sameroom.io or host a bot
>ourselves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pros:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Keep same IRC server and channel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cons:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Need to manage (and possibly host) yet another service
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone have any thoughts on these options?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>