- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:45:09 +0200
- To: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 15:45:38 UTC
Last Arie question: In the case of Identity being critical, would there not be a strong case for Security? - dynamic keys? - 3FFA? By this I assume the question is about transactions where the parties must be known due to regulations (KYC/AML)? I wouldn't conflate security and identity. A system like ILP will require that all messaging is done very securely with guarantees of authenticity a given. What this ends up being specifically is yet to be decided I think. Is a secure transport like TLS and signed messages using a unique keypair for each entity enough. Do the keys need to be part of a chain that is rooted at some specific entity (perhaps for regulatory reasons)? Lots of models and architectures to consider. What will be required is establishing some standards for how identity data will be conveyed and here we should probably look at how this is already done in message standards like ISO 20022 rather than re-invent the data dictionary?
Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 15:45:38 UTC