- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:41:55 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Indie UI <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, "John Foliot" <john@foliot.ca>
>-----Original Message----- >If extensions are acceptable, they can run JS in the page's context, and >utilize the scripting API to provide more complex values. > True, but extensions have to be written separately for each browser. What would be better is a standard mechanism for assistive technologies, the operating system or specialized applications to serve need/preference data to the browser. In addition to or instead of this, it should be possible for a Web application to populate the profile. One could even imagine a browser configuration option that lets the user specify a URI for a script that defines such a profile (executed upon start-up). ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 20:42:27 UTC