Re: Privacy and scope discussion

On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote:

> James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> My belief is that, by the time we finish IndieUI: User Context 1.0, a
>> setting listing a preference for MathML will be similarly irrelevant.
> 
> I hope you are right. My point is simply that this is in scope for discussion.
> 
> One could also argue that requiring text rather than images of text entails a
> requirement for MathML, which is merely a special case of the textual
> preference. This of course raises the question of which preferences can be
> inferred from others and which should be explicitly specifiable in User
> Contexts. I would rather defer that discussion until the requirements and use
> cases have solidified however.

Fair enough. I'd push for that one to be deferred to Post-1.0 too.

Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 08:08:33 UTC