W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-indie-ui@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [admin] Proposed changes to TF's Work Statement [Was: Re: IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 20 June 2012 at 17:00Z for 60 minutes]

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:49:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY_-v=6Ovp5Cy4VF8k6SOtYz4KGaXjJXz9dta9adukn_mA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-indie-ui@w3.org
Yes please, thank you for this!

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> Hi All - in the spirit of trying to use the mail list rather than teleconf
> time for admin-related topics, below I have two changes to propose for the
> Participation section of the TF's Work Statement ...
>
> On 6/19/12 9:34 PM, ext Janina Sajka wrote:
>
>> agenda+    Task Force Work Statement http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/**
>> IUITF <http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/IUITF>
>>
>
> 1. s/Participants must/Participants are expected to/
>
> I think being overly restrictive on participation requirements can
> alienate some of the Web App community we want to be active in this work.
>
> 2. s/, or send regrets to the Independent User Interface Task Force
> mailing list./. Regrets are expected from members of the group that have
> active roles e.g. Editors, Chair, Team Contact, etc. or commitments e.g.
> members with Open Actions. Regrets from other group participants are
> optional./
>
> I think it is useful to know when "key" contributors can't make a call but
> it's "make work" for the more non-active group members and I personally
> would consider regrets e-mails from the non-active contributors as SPAM.
>
> 3. Re the link to the "task force participants", I would prefer a Public
> link if one is available.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 16:51:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 June 2012 16:51:22 GMT