public-inbandtracks@w3.org from November 2013 by author

Bob Lund

• Re: Wiki update (Friday, 22 November)
• Wiki update (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Wiki requirements and implementation alternatives update (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: Still about "id" format (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: Wiki requirements and implementation alternatives update (Friday, 15 November)
• Wiki requirements and implementation alternatives update (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: First draft of Wiki (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)
• HTML extension spec (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)

Brendan Long

• RE: Recap of TPAC discussion (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: Still about "id" format (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: liasion letter from Open IPTV Forum to W3C In-band Tracks Community Group (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)
• RE: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)
• RE: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)

Cyril Concolato

• Re: Still about "id" format (Thursday, 14 November)
• Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Break-out session at TPAC (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Monday, 11 November)
• Break-out session at TPAC (Monday, 11 November)
• First draft of Wiki (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)

Eric Winkelman

• Re: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Friday, 8 November)

Giuseppe Pascale

• Re: Wiki update (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Wiki requirements and implementation alternatives update (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Recap of TPAC discussion (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Recap of TPAC discussion (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Wiki requirements and implementation alternatives update (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Still about "id" format (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: First draft of Wiki (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)

Jon Piesing

• RE: Still about "id" format (Friday, 15 November)
• RE: Still about "id" format (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Still about "id" format (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: liasion letter from Open IPTV Forum to W3C In-band Tracks Community Group (Tuesday, 12 November)
• liasion letter from Open IPTV Forum to W3C In-band Tracks Community Group (Tuesday, 12 November)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Recap of TPAC discussion (Thursday, 14 November)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Track "id" format? (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Track "id" format? (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for initial CG focus (Wednesday, 6 November)

Last message date: Friday, 22 November 2013 15:40:39 UTC