- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:19:33 +1100
- To: "public-ietf-w3c@w3.org" <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
FYI. Begin forwarded message: > From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Reorganizing and fixing "origin" > Date: 29 October 2013 4:19:01 AM AEDT > To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> > Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> What exactly is it you want moved, from where to where? Just the "origin >> of a URL"? I'm guessing Adam would be interested in revving the Origin >> spec to be more accurate if there's a problem with it; that would be my >> preference if at all possible. >> >> See also Adam's response to the message you cite above: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg01520.html > > Adam, are you planning on updating that RFC? Issues as I see it: > > * HTTP Origin header ABNF is faulty > * Origin for URLs references obsoleted specifications > > > (If the RFC is not being updated my alternative plan is that > http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/ continues to define the HTTP Origin > header. http://url.spec.whatwg.org/ could take over the definition for > getting an origin out of a URL and serializing an origin. And finally > HTML would define the origin concept once again.) > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 03:19:57 UTC