On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:27 , Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2012-09-21 10:22, Robin Berjon wrote: >> But as Adam keeps saying, you're probably convincing the wrong people here. You need to speak to the implementers, and to the developers who wish to rely on such features. > > We're talking about a HTML spec feature that is very controversial, as was the chair's decision to keep it. > > It's up to the WG to decide what's in and what's not. The WG (through Philippe) has asked for feedback over here, and there was feedback. > > At this point, this feedback should be forwarded to the WG. > > Asking to talk to implementers sounds like moving goal posts. No it's not. The WG is a great place to talk to implementers. I'm merely providing advice about how to best be successful with bringing your concerns to fruition — it's naturally entirely up to you whether to follow this advice or not. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjonReceived on Friday, 21 September 2012 08:54:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 08:54:59 GMT