- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:40:17 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 09:51 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-08-22 10:33, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 2012-08-01 19:33, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > >> Following the morning discussion, here are the links to the web+ > >> definition: > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/system-state-and-capabilities.html#custom-handlers > >> > >> look for the item on scheme (registerProtocolHandler() only) > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/iana.html#web-scheme-prefix > >> Note that the Working Group is about to decide that this section needs > >> rewrite because it must not look like an IANA registration. > >> > >> I also suggest to look at the rational section of a change proposal > >> related to this: > >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189#Rationale > >> > >> Philippe > > > > Two observations: > > > > a) in the meantime, the HTML WG chairs have decided to reject my CP and > > to keep "web+" in the spec (see > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0115.html>) > > > > b) all feedback I've seen over here seems to come from people either > > active in the IETF, or both IETF and W3C; what are the next steps to > > actually make progress now? > > > > Best regards, Julian > > We aren't making progress. How do we fix this? Back on August 23, I saw two proposals: 1- get the W3C webappsec to review this. I can't speak for Thomas so I'll let him respond to this. 2- modularizing the HTML5 spec. I doubt that this idea would fly at the moment since the editors are too busy... Philippe
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 20:40:25 UTC