W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > August 2012

Re: web+: enabling websites to expose services with custom URI schemes to registerProtocolHandler.

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:24:39 -0600
Message-ID: <50366757.6070202@stpeter.im>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "public-ietf-w3c@w3.org" <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/23/12 11:06 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Maybe ask IETF websec and/or W3C webappsec to review it, if the
> purpose and meaning of the "web+" prefix is a security property?

I think having the W3C WebAppSec WG look into the security aspects
makes some sense, and might be better received than yet more feedback
from "those IETF people". (Yes, we're all the same people, but folks
don't always look at it that way.)

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlA2Z1cACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzrzQCg2+98NvxY43iuB6+OndetNRja
TXMAoKGpbSqMzJuqjy0lswBoAE8eQXz8
=sWXm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:25:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:25:08 GMT