W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > August 2010

Re: contacts / calendaring coordination

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:47:32 -0600
Message-ID: <4C6B49C4.4090004@stpeter.im>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
Um, speaking of calendaring, it seems that I didn't put that on my
calendar yet. :)

On 8/17/10 7:26 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Is the Sept 2 call adequate?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> On 18/08/2010, at 3:23 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> In Maastricht we had talked about having a coordination call on this
>> topic. I'm just posting to say that I'm still interested such a call so
>> that we can start a better conversation among all the relevant parties.
>>
>> On 8/4/10 7:18 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>>> hi Mark,
>>>
>>> I had forgotten to copy you on these.  Probably worth keeping the
>>> IETF liaison to OMA in the loop on the contacts piece.
>>>
>>> Active work on these coordination items is, at this point, in Cyrus'
>>> and my hands.
>>>
>>> Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: 28 July 2010 12:21:33
>>>> GMT+02:00 To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG
>>>> <public-device-apis@w3.org> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Cyrus
>>>> Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Subject: Calendaring coordination
>>>>
>>>> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways.  The IETF
>>>> calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to
>>>> the CalConnect consortium: http://www.calconnect.org/
>>>>
>>>> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect
>>>> and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement.  I'll
>>>> follow up on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting.
>>>>
>>>> (ACTION-228)
>>>>
>>>> Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: 28 July 2010 12:15:37
>>>> GMT+02:00 To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG
>>>> <public-device-apis@w3.org> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Harry
>>>> Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> Subject: Next steps with vcard / POCO /
>>>> OMA
>>>>
>>>> The IETF's vcard4 spec is through Working Group Last Call and going
>>>> to be in IETF Last Call soon; that will be the last opportunity for
>>>> us to review and comment on that work.  Perhaps unsurprisingly,
>>>> that WG is recommending that we use vcard4 as the underlying
>>>> format, not PoCo.  There is no current communication between that
>>>> group and PoCo.
>>>>
>>>> I seem to have an action item to organize a joint conference call
>>>> with the vcard4 folks some time soon; we should also try to invite
>>>> Joseph Smarr and the OMA folks to that.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
>>>>
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 02:48:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 August 2010 02:48:06 GMT