W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > August 2010

Re: contacts / calendaring coordination

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:23:16 -0600
Message-ID: <4C6AC584.4040104@stpeter.im>
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
In Maastricht we had talked about having a coordination call on this
topic. I'm just posting to say that I'm still interested such a call so
that we can start a better conversation among all the relevant parties.

On 8/4/10 7:18 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> hi Mark,
> 
> I had forgotten to copy you on these.  Probably worth keeping the
> IETF liaison to OMA in the loop on the contacts piece.
> 
> Active work on these coordination items is, at this point, in Cyrus'
> and my hands.
> 
> Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: 28 July 2010 12:21:33
>> GMT+02:00 To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG
>> <public-device-apis@w3.org> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Cyrus
>> Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Subject: Calendaring coordination
>> 
>> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways.  The IETF
>> calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to
>> the CalConnect consortium: http://www.calconnect.org/
>> 
>> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect
>> and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement.  I'll
>> follow up on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting.
>> 
>> (ACTION-228)
>> 
>> Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Date: 28 July 2010 12:15:37
>> GMT+02:00 To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG
>> <public-device-apis@w3.org> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Harry
>> Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> Subject: Next steps with vcard / POCO /
>> OMA
>> 
>> The IETF's vcard4 spec is through Working Group Last Call and going
>> to be in IETF Last Call soon; that will be the last opportunity for
>> us to review and comment on that work.  Perhaps unsurprisingly,
>> that WG is recommending that we use vcard4 as the underlying
>> format, not PoCo.  There is no current communication between that
>> group and PoCo.
>> 
>> I seem to have an action item to organize a joint conference call
>> with the vcard4 folks some time soon; we should also try to invite
>> Joseph Smarr and the OMA folks to that.
>> 
>> Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
>> 
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 17:23:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 August 2010 17:23:52 GMT