Re: pls mark w3cMediaType-1 pending negotiations with IETF or something

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 09:51, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Friday, December 5, 2003, 12:05:52 PM, Graham wrote:
> 
> 
> GK> At 17:30 04/12/03 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >>While it's good that we are agreed, and the
> >>webarch doc is pretty well done with this,
> >>there's still work to do on issue
> >>
> >>http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#w3cMediaType-1
> >>
> >>People still seem to be using
> >>   http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype.html
> >>as guidance, and I haven't figured out whether I believe
> >>that thing or not.
> 
> GK> I wasn't aware of that document, but it looks plausible.
> 
> I am aware of it, uncomfortable with it, and wish the new process
> would move from ID to RFC so we could start using it.

I added a status label to reflect the uncertainty around it.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 5 December 2003 12:57:16 UTC