W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 03 Jul 2002 17:42:25 -0500
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>, John Stracke <JStracke@incentivesystems.com>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, ietf@ietf.org, ned.freed@mrochek.com, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
Message-Id: <1025736249.25084.76.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 15:32, Mark Baker wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 03:39:50PM -0400, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype
> 
> I've asked around about whether this document represents an agreement
> between the relevant parties,


It was prepared at the request of some relevant IETF/W3C
folks, and after discussion among those folks, but it hasn't
been endorsed by anybody but Joseph (and you) in its present form.

I think I like it... hmm... Joseph, I don't see anything
explicit about "IANA considerations" in the internet draft;
did you leave that out on purpose?

> but so far all I've heard second hand is
> "I think so".
>
> Can anybody confirm, for the public record, that this is the Way?

Not yet.
 
> (FWIW, I'm very happy with it - it's simpler than even I was hoping for)

Good to know.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 18:44:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:55 GMT