W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-collation@w3.org > September 2005

Re: comments on draft-newman-i18n-comparator-05.txt

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:59:37 +0200
Message-Id: <1ddYl1NcZo7KCMz99dQ77A.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Cc: Philip Guenther <guenther+collation@sendmail.com>, public-ietf-collation@w3.org

Mark Davis writes:
> This is exactly why systems like Java mandate that NaN be given a 
> determinate sorting order.

Does java mandate determined sorting order WITHIN NaN? That's 
meaningless for java, isn't it? It only has one NaN?

Received on Friday, 23 September 2005 08:04:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:38:40 UTC