At 17:34 05/09/22, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >We decided to adopt the draft as a WG draft, even though it's not strictly speaking an IMAP matter. As a WG draft, it's within the domain of a chair who's good at pushing people into doing reviews and good at shepherding a draft to RFC. I think this is great! This is the best way to get the draft finally moving on at greater speed. I happen to know the chair, and I agree with your description of her abilities. On the other hand, I'm somewhat worried that the we may end up with a draft that's perfect for IMAP, but doesn't work for other protocols/formats/languages. Therefore, please make sure that all discussion is (cross)posted to the public-ietf-collation@w3.org list. This at least gives people from other venues a chance to comment; if they miss that chance, then that's their fault. Regards, Martin.Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:37:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:54 GMT