W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-collation@w3.org > September 2005

Re: comments on draft-newman-i18n-comparator-05.txt

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:34:35 +0200
Message-Id: <pEw19B9PihMF5g5XNhxkUg.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
To: public-ietf-collation@w3.org
Cc: Philip Guenther <guenther+collation@sendmail.com>

Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> First, we discussed the collators in the IMAPEXT WG in Paris in 
> August. The draft is not moving and lots of IMAP work is blocked on 
> it, so it was easy for the WG chair to hold people hostage: «If we 
> don't work to get collators out as RFC, this group's work is blocked 
> forever.» She's right: An RFC has been ready to publish since 
> December 2003, it's just waiting for one definition in the collator 
> draft.

Ah, crap, I accidentally deleted one paragraph instead of moving it. It 
said roughly this:

We decided to adopt the draft as a WG draft, even though it's not 
strictly speaking an IMAP matter. As a WG draft, it's within the domain 
of a chair who's good at pushing people into doing reviews and good at 
shepherding a draft to RFC.

Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 08:39:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:38:40 UTC