RE: Closing Issue 502 ( was RE: Issue 502 is closed )

I think the sentence makes sense as is, but I've added the 'the' anyway. We used 'schemes' because our understanding is that it's the scheme which defines what characters are legal in an identifier per that scheme.

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Addison Phillips [wM] [mailto:aphillips@webmethods.com] 
> Sent: 15 October 2004 15:18
> To: Martin Gudgin; Martin Duerst; I18n WSTF; xmlp-comments@w3.org
> Cc: Yves Lafon
> Subject: RE: Closing Issue 502 ( was RE: Issue 502 is closed )
> 
> Hello Martin,
> 
> The following note is personal, rather than from the I18N WG.
> 
> Tiny quibble. I think there is a typo in your change to the 
> document. You say:
> 
> > attribute information item. NOTE: the use of the xs:anyURI type
> > anticipates the possibility that in future schemes will be developed
> > that use IRI rather than URI naming for resources."
> > 
> 
> I believe that the word "the" is missing in the phrase "that 
> in THE future schemes"
> 
> Also, I'm not sure that "schemes" is a very clear word choice 
> here. Perhaps it would be better to say something like:
> 
> "NOTE: the use of the xs:anyURI type anticipates the adoption 
> of IRIs to replace URIs for the naming of resources"
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Addison
> 
> Addison P. Phillips
> Director, Globalization Architecture
> webMethods | Delivering Global Business Visibility
> http://www.webMethods.com

> Chair, W3C Internationalization (I18N) Working Group
> Chair, W3C-I18N-WG, Web Services Task Force
> http://www.w3.org/International

> 
> Internationalization is an architecture. 
> It is not a feature.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-i18n-ws-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-i18n-ws-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Martin Gudgin
> > Sent: 2004年10月15日 4:40
> > To: Martin Duerst; I18n WSTF; xmlp-comments@w3.org
> > Cc: Yves Lafon
> > Subject: Closing Issue 502 ( was RE: Issue 502 is closed )
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org 
> > > [mailto:xmlp-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst
> > > Sent: 07 October 2004 23:58
> > > To: Yves Lafon; I18n WSTF
> > > Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: Issue 502 is closed
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello Yves, others,
> > > 
> > > This is the official response of the I18N WG (WS Task Force) to
> > > your response on your issue number 502.
> > > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x502

> > > 
> > > At 20:22 04/09/24 +0200, Yves Lafon wrote:
> > > >On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, A. Vine wrote:
> > > >
> > > >[issue 502 [1] covers the points 5 and 6 of your email [2]. ]
> > > >
> > > >The XMLP WG decided to close issue 502 with the 
> following resolution:
> > > >
> > > >point 5:
> > > >The following text was added to section 4.2.2:
> > > ><<<
> > > >The value of the resource attribute information SHOULD be a 
> > > URI Reference 
> > > >as defined in RFC 2396 including ammendments to that 
> > > definition found in 
> > > >RFC 2732.
> > > 
> > > This would rule out IRIs. But we explicitly asked for 
> allowing IRIs.
> > > It is unclear to us why this was rejected, and we would 
> have to object
> > > to such a decision.
> > 
> > Dear Martin and I18N,
> > 
> > Regarding issue 502[1], the XMLP Working Group has amended 
> section 4.2.2
> > if the Resource Representation SOAP Header Block 
> specification to read:
> > 
> > "The type of the resource attribute information item is 
> xs:anyURI. The
> > value of the resource attribute information item is a URI that
> > identifies the Web resource whose representation is carried in the
> > rep:Representation element information item parent of the resource
> > attribute information item. NOTE: the use of the xs:anyURI type
> > anticipates the possibility that in future schemes will be developed
> > that use IRI rather than URI naming for resources."
> > 
> > We trust this addresses your concern about allowing IRIs in 
> the resource
> > attribute.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Martin Gudgin
> > For the XMLP WG
> > 
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x502

> 
>

Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 14:56:42 UTC