W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: ACTION-50 , checked BP 13-18

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:59:56 +0900
Message-ID: <478195AC.1080107@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org

Yves Savourel wrote:
> Going through Bartosz notes:
>
>   
>> BP13:
>> XSLT standard. The question is - should we point to XSLT 2.0
>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xslt20-20070123/) or XSLT 1.0
>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt)?
>>     
>
> I wonder. Here XSLT is just an example. We probably should have a Bib link to XSLT from the XLST occurence in this section, but I'm
> not sure if the XSLT link should be in a reference section for this BP.
>
> Thoughts anyone?
>   
I agree with Yves.
>
>   
>> BP14:
>> Again Docbook v5.0 Working Draft
>> (http://www.docbook.org/specs/docbook-5.0CR3-spec-wd-01.html)
>> or Docbook 4.5 OASIS Standard
>> (http://www.docbook.org/specs/docbook-4.5-spec.html)
>>
>> XHTML - http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/
>>     
>
> Maybe reference to the specific section for <span> and <phrase> rather than the top of the spec?
>   
+1

Felix
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 03:00:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC