W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > October to December 2007

RE: BP comments

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:02:09 -0000
To: "'Jirka Kosek'" <jirka@kosek.cz>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008701c843da$13fd0660$6501a8c0@rishida>

Hi Jirka,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jirka Kosek
> Sent: 20 December 2007 09:32
> To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
> Subject: BP comments
> 
> Hi,
> 
> yesterday I read whole BP document. Please find below some of 
> my comments.
> 
...
> 
> BP9: Defining markup for unique identifier:
> There is sentence: "Make sure that elements with translatable 
> content are associated with a unique identifier."
> 
> I think that "are" should be replaced by "can be". It is not 
> always necessary to assign unique ids. Moreover this BP9 is 
> for schema authors
> -- and schema can only provide means for associating IDs but 
> IDs themselves are present in instance which is being 
> localized not in schema.

Good catch.  Fixed.


The rest of your comments are probably best reviewed by Yves.

Cheers,
Veselé Vánoce

RI
Received on Friday, 21 December 2007 13:59:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:50 GMT