> "Defining markup for natural language labelling": > This does not mention xml:lang any more, so it seems to be > something different (not only more general) than the original > "Providing xml:lang to specify ...". Just wondering if that's OK? Good point. I recall that we had something general original, and then someone outside the WG made a comment about specifically using "xml:lang" in the title. This said: I'm not sure why xml:lang would need a special treatment... Cheers, -yvesReceived on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 00:23:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:50 GMT