W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: ACTION ITEM: rework general section about extending/customizing schemas (http://www.w3.org/International/its/track/actions/1)

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:49:40 +0200
Message-ID: <46E7EE74.3030800@kosek.cz>
To: "Lieske, Christian" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Lieske, Christian wrote:

> Here's an modified version of the draft. The modifications should address the feedback which was sent.

It looks good to me, see just one small comment below:

> 3. The mechanisms which you can or have to use depend on the schema
> language (DTD, XSD, RelaxNG, ...). Namespace-based modularization of schemas

I would add NVDL into this list of schema languages.

Speaking of NVDL I think that we somehow forgot to complete conclusions
made on F2F:

mainly because we haven't time to finish NVDL discussion during the
second day. But it seems that there is consensus that it would be
strange to have specific NVDL section because it could make NVDL to
prominent. But given the elegance of NVDL I would like to see at least
one or two customizations based on NVDL in BP.

I already created XHTML+ITS and DocBook+ITS customizations using NVDL.
What about adding them to BP to show that there are alternative
approaches for creating ITS-enabled schema?


  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member

Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 13:49:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC