W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2007

RE: BP 8 - change update

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:25:23 -0600
To: "'Lieske, Christian'" <christian.lieske@sap.com>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001101c7c234$fc514160$8d05a8c0@BREIZH>

Hi Christian, all,

>> The its:rules element provides access to the its:locNoteRule element
>
> I am looking for an alternative to "provides access to". What about 
> "allows definition of"?

How about:

"The its:rules element allows using the its:locNoteRule element to specify localization-related notes and instruction at a more
general level."

[rational: to me we 'define' a loc note rather than 'define' its:locNoteRule itself.]

Original was:

"The its:rules element provides access to the its:locNoteRule element which can be used to specify localization-related notes and
instruction at a more general level."



>> Note: its:rules can be created in a separate file, but it is more
>> efficient to allow the authors to include the rules directly into 
>> their documents.
>
> I don't understand, why "inclusion into a document" is more efficient.

I was thinking of the case where locNoteRule uses locNote to define the notes themselves (not to point to XML elements). Another
reason is to override the lco note information at the file level.

It seems we may need to elaborate locNoteRule more to show the different possibilities and the different scopes. I'll try to come up
with something.

-ys
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 14:25:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC