- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:22:31 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Yves Savourel wrote: > By the way, one additional note: > > The term "Precedence order" has been throwing me off several times. To > me it normally means "the order in which the members of an expression > are evaluated" (just like in math or in programming) and in the > specification we use the term with a list that show the reverse order in > which the rules should be evaluated (which is more like a "overriding > order"). > > I've been afraid that at some point someone is going to implement the > exact reverse order we intended. But maybe that's just me: I'm guessing > that term used like that in other W3C specification(?) no, and I have no preference for precedence order. overriding order is fine as well. Felix
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 14:22:44 UTC