W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > April to June 2007

RE: Checklists for reviews

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:33:52 +0100
To: "'Mark Davis'" <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00c801c7875f$e4873ea0$6501a8c0@rishida>

> 	language information that does not describe the text in 
> the document should not use xml:lang
> 
> 
> why is this necessarily the case? Not arguing, but wondering why.

I was perhaps a bit laconic, but referring to http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-when-xmllang

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com 
> [mailto:mark.edward.davis@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Davis
> Sent: 25 April 2007 17:39
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 17:33:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:49 GMT