Re: Action item - Result format proposal

Hi Yves,

I'm mostly fine with your proposal, just one issue: you have decided to
get rid of potentially embedded markup for localization notes. For
these, that is fine, but for ruby, we will need to (or should, to be
identical with the ruby spec) preserve the embedded markup. It might
happen that there is markup in no namespace, which when makes it
difficult to see the difference. So I would vote for describing the
output in general namespace qualified, e.g. its:translate instead of
translate. This makes it also easier to see the difference between
"helper" markup (like the <output> element) and the actual output where
you need to preserve markup (i.e. the @translate attribute).

Cheers,

Felix

2006-12-13 (水) の 11:59 -0700 に Yves Savourel さんは書きました: 
> I had the following action item:
> 
> > - [NEW]: Yves to extract the result format for each data category from
> his 
> > implementation and send it to the list. esp. Sebastian and Felix to
> check 
> > if they can live with Yves's proposal
> 
> Here is my proposal. I've described only the <output> element as the
> rest (<nodeList>, <node>) looks fine to me.
> 
> 
> === Translate data category:
> 
> If the node is translatable:
> 
> <output translate="yes"/> 
> 
> 
> If the node is not translatable:
> 
> <output translate="no"/> 
> 
> 
> 
> === Localization Note data category:
> 
> If there is no localiation associated with the node:
> 
> <output/>
> 
> 
> If there is a locNote text associated with the node (locNoteType is
> required):
> 
> <output locNoteType="description|alert">
>  <locNoteText>The inner text of the node (can be empty)</locNoteText>
> </output>
> 
> 
> If there is a locNote reference associated with the node (locNoteType is
> required):
> 
> <output locNoteType="description|alert">
>  <locNoteReference>The reference string (can be
> empty)</locNoteReference>
> </output>
> 
> 
> === Terminology data category:
> 
> If there the node is not a term:
> 
> <output term="no"/>
> 
> 
> If the node is a term and the termInfo is text:
> 
> <output term="yes">
>  <termInfoText>Inner text of the node (can be empty)</termInfoText>
> </output>
> 
> 
> If the node is a term and the termInfo is text:
> 
> <output term="yes">
>  <termInfoReference>The reference string (can be
> empty)</termInfoReference>
> </output>
> 
> 
> === Element Within Text data category:
> 
> If the node is within text:
> 
> <output withinText="yes"/>
> 
> 
> If the node is nested:
> 
> <output withinText="nested"/>
> 
> 
> If the node is neither within text nor nested:
> 
> <output withinText="no"/>
> 
> 
> Those are the only data categories I support.
> Note that this proposal is different from my current output. I thought
> removing all ITS namespace reference here would make sense as we are
> representing ITS results not ITS instructions.
> 
> Kenavo,
> -yves
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 19:09:09 UTC