W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: [Bug 3062] Need to write examples in the spec as valid XML

From: Sebastian Rahtz <Sebastian.Rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:48:00 +0100
Message-ID: <442D2500.6080507@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org

Felix Sasaki wrote:

> that's true as well. I think we have two choices:
> - 1 Rely on the prose description, which says (or should say) what is
> mandatory. It says even more than a schema, e.g. that the value of
> its:selector is an XPath expression.

fair point.

if we have prose which is normative, you might as well
go the whole way and write BNF productions by hand (as I
assume XSLT does), and the schema(s) can be part of implementation

> - 2 Rely on the ODD definitions, and say that these are normative. (no
> matter if they are written as "production rules" or visualized in a
> style like http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/html/TD.html ).

in that case parts of the schemas *do* become normative.

I am sorry to have raised this so late. I had been assuming
until relatively recently that the schemas were normative
and I hadnt thought through the implications of them not being so.
Sebastian Rahtz

*Open Source and Sustainability*
10-12 April 2006, Oxford

Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
Received on Friday, 31 March 2006 12:48:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:04:09 UTC