http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3017 ------- Comment #10 from sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk 2006-03-27 16:48 ------- > Then maybe using XLink's simple link would be better: not re-inventing > > something and keeping it processable by simple tools. I'm not very familiar > > with XLink but it seems we should be able to do: > > > > <its:link xlink:href="someRules.xml"/> Without any indication of the semantics of the link, the word <link> is still a bit odd. This would work fine, though its a pain declaring yet another namespace, but I'd still rather see something like <rulesLink>Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 16:49:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:46 GMT