W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 3000] Allowing extensibility in its:documentRules

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:47:42 +0000
CC:
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FNqCE-0005Cw-6d@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3000





------- Comment #13 from fsasaki@w3.org  2006-03-27 11:47 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> From my understanding, we needed provisions for allowing non-ITS namespace
> markup in the non-normative schemas. We seem to have/get this once Sebastian
> has passed some ODD-related info to Felix.
> 
> What remains to be done wrt. the extensibility issue is the following:
> 
> 0. advice people against working with extensions for which ITS capabilities
> exist; example: If your vocabulary captures translatability information with an
> attribute "myVoc:TranslateMe='y'" than use the ITS mapping/passthrough
> capabilities rather than working with an extension "myVoc:Translate='y'"
> 
> 1. make sure that the spec. mentions that ITS does not provide ITS-specific
> extensibility (and rather relies on standard XML-namespace based mechanisms)
> 2. mention that the non-normative schemas are designed for use with standard
> (that is XML-namespace based) mechanism
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian
> 

looks all fine to me. A question to Sebastian: Is it possible and necessary to
generate a schema like above out of ODD? 
A question to all: would it be enough to show such an example schema just as an
example? It is not normative anyway, see
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2924#c3
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 11:47:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC