W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2924] Why a closed list of schema languages?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:40:51 +0000
CC:
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FNq5b-00050U-I9@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2924





------- Comment #4 from fsasaki@w3.org  2006-03-27 11:40 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> His another possibility which I see to address Eric's concern:
> 
> 1. Change the definition as follows:
> 
> [Definition: Schema language refers in this specification to an XML-related
> modelling or validation language such as XML DTD, XML Schema
> or RELAX NG.]
> 
> 2. Be explicit about the status and motivation of the formalizations which ITS
> provides:
> 
> a. ITS gives formalizations which are non-normative
> b. ITS gives formalizations in XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG since these
> schema languages appear to be most relevant for ITS usage scenarios
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian
> 

+1 for everything, except "modeling or"
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 11:40:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC