[Bug 2924] Why a closed list of schema languages?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2924





------- Comment #4 from fsasaki@w3.org  2006-03-27 11:40 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> His another possibility which I see to address Eric's concern:
> 
> 1. Change the definition as follows:
> 
> [Definition: Schema language refers in this specification to an XML-related
> modelling or validation language such as XML DTD, XML Schema
> or RELAX NG.]
> 
> 2. Be explicit about the status and motivation of the formalizations which ITS
> provides:
> 
> a. ITS gives formalizations which are non-normative
> b. ITS gives formalizations in XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG since these
> schema languages appear to be most relevant for ITS usage scenarios
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian
> 

+1 for everything, except "modeling or"